Did you know as R value increases, thermal performance improves? That is a simple concept to understand – bigger is better right? Conversely, did you know that as U value decreases, thermal performance improves? These are fairly well understood realities, so it would not be surprising if your answer to both these questions is yes. Would you be surprised to know that they are actually a measurement of the same thing? Maybe not literally, but essentially. OK – maybe you do know this, but my guess is that we are starting to get some head scratching.
R value is called “thermal resistance”, and U value is called “heat transfer coefficient” – but in reality they are quite similar. Both measurements are dependent on the thickness of the material that is being measured. They are both measurements that characterize thermal conductivity of a material.
The simple difference? R value is the mathematical inverse of U value and vice versa. That is R=1/U and likewise U=1/R so clearly it is desirable to have large R numbers and small U values to reduce thermal conductivity.
Did you know there are three modes of heat transfer – Conduction, Convection, and Radiation? To demonstrate examples of all three, we will take a look at a campfire scenario. Suppose you are preparing to make S’Mores and, of course, one of the main ingredients is a fire-roasted marshmallow.
As you place your marshmallow on a wire and place it into position, glowing coals heat the surrounding air, which causes the air to move. The heated air flowing past the marshmallow illustrates the convective heat transfer process as the marshmallow and wire start to rise in temperature.
As some time goes by, you will notice the handle of your wire starts to heat up. This is heat energy being “conducted” from the heated end of the wire to the cool end of the wire through a highly conductive material (steel). This is heat transfer by conduction.
Finally, as you get closer to the fire, you are not touching the fire or hot coals but you feel the heat “radiating” onto your skin as you face the fire. This illustrates the radiative heat transfer process. One thing you must understand – heat energy always flows from hot to cold – always.
Now that you are heat transfer experts – you can confidently say that walls which are constructed with a high R value are very good at resisting heat transfer by conduction.
Ever hear of the term “continuous insulation”? That is a relatively new buzz phrase, which again provides for improved resistance to conductive heat transfer. It is safe to say we have addressed energy loss through conduction very well, at least it is a fairly well understood concept and treatment is relatively simple.
Now the question becomes – how does that same wall perform against the other two modes of heat transfer – convection and radiation? That is the question moving forward, because it has been reported that between 30% and 50% of energy loss in buildings is attributable to air leakage.
Yet isn’t it curious that we describe the energy efficiency of walls in terms of R value – and the energy efficiency of windows in U value – when these only account for conductive heat transfer and neglect a known major contributor to energy loss? Until now, the general concept for improving wall thermal performance has centered around adding insulation and improving thermal breaks. Now that we know better – shouldn’t we do better?
R value and U value have nothing to do with convective or radiant heat transfer. Windows are measured for “solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC)” which indicates how well window glass prevents the transmission of radiant energy from the sun into a room. We don’t really evaluate opaque construction for anything other than R value.
What we do measure, on an improving basis, is air leakage of constructed buildings and assembly mock-ups. We know performance goals are established in the building codes for air leakage. Someone – somewhere – may even know why those goals were set at those levels in the first place.
We know that reducing air leakage reduces energy loss by convection. What we fail to do is quantify energy loss by convection, so what we should be doing is looking to address wall energy efficiency by looking at all modes of heat transfer that affect various types of walls in various climates. Maybe you say this is an impossible task. I say all things are impossible until they become possible.
Tremco has continually been building on its commitment to the built environment. We want to be able to dramatically transform today’s buildings, enabling them to use less energy and reduce emissions. We have focused on managing critical connections and ensuring compatible, integrated design.
With our Sustainable Building Solutions Test Facility, we are providing critical data that will enable the design team to make sound decisions and ensure long-term sustainability. With our new enhancements to the test facility, we are taking our ability to help analyze performance beyond components, assemblies and walls to the building enclosure. This investment will enable us to help those in our industry to reach initiatives being mandated for energy efficiency and more.